NAS RF Report: More Research Needed, But No Priorities Offered
The NAS-NRC report, released today (see our January 15 post), presents a laundry list of research needs to better understand the possible health effects of RF radiation. What's missing is any sense of...
View ArticleAre All Effects Thermal?
"Are there any biological effects that are not caused by an increase in tissue temperature (nonthermal effects)?" That was one of the "overarching issues" considered by the NAS-NRC committee at the...
View ArticleFrank Barnes Calls for More Research
Frank Barnes of the University of Colorado in Boulder is calling for more studies on the effects of cell phones on children. "There are definitely unknowns and there are definitely experiments that...
View ArticleUnified Theory of Magnetic Field Action
Paul Héroux has a problem. He believes he has identified a way to control the growth of cancer cells, but he can't get his ideas into print. "We think we have the Rosetta Stone that will allow us to...
View ArticleIncubator Magnetic Fields Confounding
Lucas Portelli just ran over the Cheshire cat. He didn't know it was there. He's too young to appreciate how this fictional feline has held sway in the EMF-health controversy.
View ArticleBarnes Greenebaum Weak Field Effects
Weak RF fields may indeed be able to promote cancer, according to two leading members of the EMF/RF research community. Frank Barnes and Ben Greenebaum are offering theoretical arguments to explain how...
View ArticleNTP Cancer Results
The cell phone cancer controversy will never be the same again.The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) is expected to issue a public announcement that cell phone radiation presents a cancer risk for...
View ArticleClik here to view.
NTP Peer Review Sees Tumor Risk
“You had it right the first time.” That was the implicit message to the National Toxicology Program (NTP) from an expert panel after a point-by-point review of NTP’s draft reports on its $25 million...
View ArticleFact-Free Hit on a 5G Critic
Last Tuesday (July 16), the New YorkTimes devoted most of the front page of its science section to Bill Broad’s latest attack on those who challenge the dogma that wireless radiation is absolutely safe.
View ArticleNew Approach to RF Limits
“Over the last 20 years the evidence has become extremely strong that weaker EMF over the whole range for frequencies from static through mm waves can modify biological processes.” They propose...
View ArticleRF Inhibits Tumors
“Pilot Study on the Therapeutic Potential of RF Magnetic Fields: Growth Inhibition of Implanted Tumors,” British Journal of Cancer, September 2020. “Although the limited number of animals used in the...
View ArticleRobert Adair Dead at 96
Robert K. Adair, the former chairman of the physics department at Yale University and a leading critic of any and all claims that weak EMFs can have biological effects, died on September 28. He was...
View ArticleThe End of BEMS A Merger or a Heist?
The Bioelectromagnetics Society (BEMS) and the European BioElectromagnetics Association (EBEA), the two leading research groups in Western countries, will soon join together and become BioEM. Like its...
View ArticleImpact of Weak RF & Static Magnetic Fields on Key Signaling Molecules
“Impact of Weak RF and Static Magnetic Fields on Key Signaling Molecules, Intracellular pH, Membrane Potential and Cell Growth in HT‐1080 Fibrosarcoma Cells,” Scientific Reports, August 30, 2023.Weak...
View Article